<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Verifier on LoopGain Blog</title>
    <link>https://loopgain.ai/blog/tags/verifier/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Verifier on LoopGain Blog</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://loopgain.ai/blog/tags/verifier/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How to design a strong verifier for AI agent loops</title>
      <link>https://loopgain.ai/blog/posts/how-to-design-a-strong-verifier/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://loopgain.ai/blog/posts/how-to-design-a-strong-verifier/</guid>
      <description>An AI agent loop is only as right as the verifier that tells it when to stop. We re-graded our own benchmark and found ~1 in 20 &amp;#39;converged&amp;#39; runs were actually wrong. Here&amp;#39;s how to build a verifier whose &amp;#39;zero errors&amp;#39; means correct — oracles over opinions, edge coverage, held-out checks, and equality that means equality.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
